Nobel-Winning Economist Shiller: Bitcoin Could Be Another Failed Monetary Experiment.

The advent of the cryptocurrency market resembles that of some of the most failed monetary experiments in history, according to Robert Shiller. This Nobel Prize speaks of cryptocurrencies, we will see if he does it in a technical way or based on vague information.

Therefore he states the following, “Nobody can explain how cryptocurrencies work.” Writing in a new blog posted today, the Yale professor and Nobel-winning economist wrote that enthusiasm for the cryptocurrency market remains strong despite warnings that it could be a scam. ‘One must bear in mind that attempts to reinvent money have a long history,’ he said. Yet, while new monetary innovations create excitement to begin with, they fail to last, he added.

As an example he cited Josiah Warner, who in 1827 opened the ‘Cincinnati Time Store’ that sold merchandise in units of hours of work. These relied on labour notes, which resembled paper money; however, while they were considered a sign of importance of working people, the store closed in 1830.

Undeterred by Warner’s failure, two years later Robert Owen attempted to create the National Equitable Labour Exchange in London. This relied on ‘time money’ as a currency. Yet, similar to Warner’s attempts Owen’s experiment failed as well, Shiller pointed out.

A hundred years later, during the Great Depression, economist John Pease Norton proposed a dollar backed not by gold, but by electricity. Notably, though, this too failed to catch on.

“Each of these monetary innovations has been coupled with a unique technological story,” wrote Shiller. “But, more fundamentally, all are connected with a deep yearning for some kind of revolution in society.”

In his opinion, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are no different, and he adds: “The cryptocurrencies are a statement of faith in a new community of entrepreneurial cosmopolitans who hold themselves above national governments, which are viewed as the drivers of a long train of inequality and war.” From this perspective it may be that the Nobel Prize tries to discover the genesis of cryptocurrencies, which some think its origin is due to the crisis of 2008, the State was overtaken by innovation and is a response of society.

He goes on to state that similar to past failed currencies, “the public’s fascination with cryptocurrencies is tied to a sort of mystery.” This thinker does not know or does not want to recognize that by the time of the 1827s, there was no reliable way to keep an accounting in line with spending, to provide transparency, immutability, to avoid double spending, this is provided by blockchain technology. bitcoin, which is the heart of cryptocurrencies.

The following is also mentioned, “Practically no one, outside of computer science departments, can explain how cryptocurrencies work,” he said.” That mystery creates an aura of exclusivity, gives the new money glamour, and fills devotees with revolutionary zeal. None of this is new, and, as with past monetary innovations, a compelling story may not be enough.”

This is certainly not the first time that Shiller has spoken out against the cryptocurrency market. Last October, he called bitcoin a ‘fad,’ as he commented on the ‘strange enthusiasm’ for the currency. Earlier this year, he was reported as being conflicted on bitcoin and wasn’t sure whether it would fail or succeed. He’s also said bitcoin is a bubble and that it only attracts investors because it is a good story.

One of the things that draws attention with this information is that it is possible that the Nobel Prize, as a student of economics has not thoroughly investigated the possibilities that blockchain-bitcoin technology has in these times of ICT, in a world Once more informed, where young people who are the engines of new technologies no longer believe in traditional financial systems, banks no longer have the influence of years ago. Therefore a disruptive technology has been born that is unstoppable, it is a pity for a person who won a prize, but who does not contribute anything more. It waits for new ads.


Disclaimer: This press release is for informational purposes information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to invest. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of infocoin, and should not be attributed to, Infocoin.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *