BIP100 a code Proposal That Could Serve as a Solution.

Bitcoin developers Tom Harding, Dagur Valberg Johannsson and Jeff Garzik have updated the code to BIP100, a “dynamic maximum block size by miner vote” code proposal which has been in the works for nearly two years. The BIP (short for ‘Bitcoin Improvement Proposal’) could serve as a solution to the ongoing debate over Bitcoin’s block size.

A BIP represents a design document meant to introduce new features and information to the Bitcoin community. BIPs represent a central avenue for communicating ideas to the distributed Bitcoin community.

Theoretically, the BIP would allow miners to vote on what the block size limit should be. Mr. Harding believes that miners are actually more invested in Bitcoin than other participants in the peer-to-peer network, and thus better equipped to make decisions.

“They invest in hardware that cannot be used for anything else, and they are the one group that will always, every day, be paid in bitcoin and no other currency”, “In the aggregate, miners’ stewardship of the protocol secures Bitcoin. This was Satoshi’s design and it has proven correct beyond all expectations”. Says the Bitcoin developer.

When he first read BIP100, Mr. Harding did not like it. “I believed in June 2015 that miners might manipulate the block size in ways that were not in the best interest of all users”, he tells “But over the next two years, it was we developers who showed ourselves unable to manage the maximum block size reasonably”.

The text of the BIP100 puts emphasis on the miners. “Miners directly feel the effects, both positive and negative, of any maximum block size change imposed by their peers”, reads the proposal on Github. “Larger blocks allow more growth in the on-chain ecosystem, while smaller blocks reduce resource requirements network-wide”.

According to the Github proposal, miners act as an “efficient proxy” for the Bitcoin system since they earn bitcoins when they create blocks.

In order to be deployed, BIP100 needs to garner a considerable amount of support from miners. “A simple deterministic system is specified, whereby a 75% mining supermajority may activate a change to the maximum block size each 2016 blocks”, “Each change is limited to a 5% increase from the previous block size hard limit, or a decrease of similar magnitude”. Reads the proposal.

BIP100 has been in the making for nearly two years. The proposal was published first by Mr. Garzik, who runs the enterprise blockchain firm Bloq, and who enjoys waxing about the intersection of artificial intelligence and Bitcoin.


Disclaimer: This press release is for informational purposes only. Information does not constitute an investment advice or an offer to invest. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author, they do not necessarily represent infocoin views and should not be attributed to Infocoin.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *